Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Nathanial Mack v. Pete Ricketts, et al
as 19-3450
Defendant / Appellee:
Heather Jackson, Nebraska State Penitentiary Mental Health Practitioner II (officially and individually), Richard Cruickshank, Nebraska State Penitentiary Warden (officially and individually), Jeramy Simonsen, Nebraska State Penitentiary Mental Health Practitioner II and former Acting Clinical Sex Offender Programs Manager and C-Sort Vice Chair Person (officially and individually) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nathanial Gerald Serrell Mack
Anderton et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11306
Plaintiff:
Eric Palm, Michael Arrington, William Roberts and others
Defendant:
Robert Bosch GmbH, General Motors LLC and Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Mack v. Ricketts et al
as 8:2017cv00495
Defendant:
Dr. Stephanie Bruhn, Wayne Chandlier, Rosalyn Cotton and others
Plaintiff:
Nathanial Gerald Serrell Mack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurt v. USA
as 5:2016cv00271
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
JASON HURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Fitzgerald v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services et al
as 8:2016cv00101
Defendant:
Richard Cruickshank, Scott Frakes, William Hendricks and others
Plaintiff:
Damon E. Fitzgerald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Golden v. Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2015cv00147
Defendant:
Mark Boyer, Department of Corrections, James Ellinger and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly Marinus Golden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pratt v. State of Nebraska Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2014cv00392
Defendant:
Jan and John Does, Ex Director Robert Houston, Jason Hurt and others
Plaintiff:
Juneal Pratt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Tan et al
as 4:2013cv03206
Defendant:
Sue Baum, Trish Brockman, Jane Doe Dianne and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
