Cases 1 - 8 of 8
KOKINDA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv00217
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PILLAI, CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KOKINDA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv01580
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PEGRAM, SHELLEY MANKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KOKINDA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv01457
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PILLAI, CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KOKINDA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv01303
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BYUNGHAK JIN, CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KOKINDA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv00005
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RHONDA HOUSE, SHELLY A. MANKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KOKINDA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2015cv01593
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MICHELE HOWARD DIGGS, CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KOKINDA v. JIN et al
as 2:2015cv00179
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant:
BYUNGHAK JIN, MICHELLE DIGGS, IRMA VIHLIDAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KOKINDA v. COLEMAN et al
as 5:2013cv02202
Petitioner:
JASON KOKINDA
Respondent:
BRIAN COLEMAN, KATHLEEN KANE and JAMES B. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
