Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 66
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv02203
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mohammed Adnan Umar v. Jeh C. Johnson et al
as 8:2016cv02204
Respondent: Sandra Hutchens, David Jennings, Jeh C. Johnson and others
Petitioner: Mohammed Adnan Umar
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv02206
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv02202
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv08749
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Philip v. Park et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv02977
Petitioner: Manasseh Philip
Respondent: Jason Park and NFN Quach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Park v. Janssen Research & Development LLC f/k/a Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv12873
Plaintiff: Jason Park
Defendant: Janssen Research & Development LLC f/k/a Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. f/k/a Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc. f/k/a Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv06427
Plaintiff: Davis, Susan Davis, Matthew Eckles and others
Defendant: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Parks v. Haas We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv11702
Petitioner: Jason Parks
Respondent: Randall Haas
Amos v. Park We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00169
Plaintiff: Qwanteldrick N. Amos
Defendant: Jason Park
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?