Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Lee Swafford v. Jason Rohrer, et al
as 22-16498
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEE SWAFFORD, AKA Swafford Lee
Defendant / Appellee:
JASON ROHRER
Defendant:
R. NEUSHMID, Warden, T. WAMBLE, OLLER, R.N. and others
Louis Branch v. Lori Austin, et al
as 20-16355
Defendant / Appellee:
B. HADE, Medical Doctor, LORI AUSTIN, Chief Executive Officer Health Care, A. MULLIGAN-PFILE, Physician and Surgeon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS BRANCH
(PC) Branch v. Austin et al
as 2:2019cv01742
Defendant:
Jason Rohrer, B. Hade, A. Mulligan-Pfile and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Swafford v. Neuschmid et al
as 2:2019cv00721
Defendant:
Jason Rohrer, T Wamble, C/O Bucker and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Swafford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swafford v. Neuschmid et al
as 3:2019cv01250
Defendant:
Dr. Jason Rohrer, C/O Bucker, T. Wamble and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Swafford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rohrer v. Bowman Tree Services
as 5:2016cv01884
Plaintiff:
Jason Rohrer
Defendant:
Bowman Tree Services
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Nyles Watson v. Gary Swarthout, et al
as 12-15687
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NYLES LAWAYNE WATSON
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY SWARTHOUT, TRAQUINA, Dr., C.M.O., RICHARD TAN, M.D. and others
Blasingame, et al v. Sisto, et al
as 2:2010cv00514
Plaintiff:
Ralph Blasingame, Anthony Miliotti, Brian Tomasello and others
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, Alvaro Traquina, Tesie R. Rallos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hassel et al v. Sisto et al
as 2:2010cv00191
Plaintiff:
David Biagas, Toussant Brown, Brian David Frye and others
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, Alvaro Traquina, Tesie R. Rallos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BIAGAS et al v. hassel et al
as 2:2010at00096
Defendant:
david hassel, D. K. Sisto, Alvaro Traquina and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID BIAGAS, TOUSSANT BROWN, Brian David Frye and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
