Cases 1 - 10 of 17
MARTIN et al v. HOLT et al
as 5:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Judge BEVERLY B MARTIN, Khalid Mouton and BEVERLY B MARTIN
Defendant:
PO AHMED HOLT, ROBERT TOOLE, STAN SHEPARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Leisa Garcia
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Michael Anderson, Marquette Sistrunk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Johnson et al
as 6:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Norman Simpson
Defendant:
Javaka Johnson, Marquette Sistrump, Korbin Tippin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Johnson et al
as 6:2021cv00078
Plaintiff:
Devon Leo Porter
Defendant:
Unit Manager Javaka Johnson, Warden Trevonza Bobbit and CO II Latoya Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodge v. Bobbit et al
as 6:2021cv00019
Defendant:
Georgia State Prison, Javaka Johnson, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Quincy Demone Hodge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodge v. Bobbitt et al
as 6:2020cv00098
Defendant:
Floyd Bobbitt, Dr. Jones, Unit Manager Javaka Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Quincy Demone Hodge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harvey v. Ashley-Toby et al
as 6:2020cv00081
Defendant:
Sgt. Susan Clayton, Warden Berry, Javaka Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Deryan M. Harvey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Honeycutt v. Mikell et al
as 6:2020cv00068
Defendant:
Mr. Javaka Johnson, Mr. Marcus Mikell, Ms. Juanita Sharpe and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Honeycutt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Johnson et al
as 6:2019cv00053
Defendant:
Javaka Johnson, James Deal, C/O Huggins and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Jewann Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
