Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Julie A. Su v. The Exclusive Poultry Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv08185
Plaintiff:
Department of Labor and Julie A. Su
Defendant:
Tony Elvis Bran, Karen Rios, Juan Valtierra and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Javier Meza v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00420
Plaintiff:
Javier Meza
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Meza v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2021cv00116
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Javier Meza
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Francisco Javier Meza et al v. LivaNova Deutschland, GmbH et al
as 1:2018cv01035
Defendant:
Livanova Deutschland GMBH and LivaNova Holding USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Francisco Javier Meza and Maria Isabel Meza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Francisco Javier Meza et al v. LivaNova Deutschland, GmbH et al
as 2:2018cv03538
Defendant:
LivaNova Holding USA, Inc., LivaNova Deutschland, GmbH, Sorin Group Deutschland GmbH and others
Plaintiff:
Maria Isabel Meza and Francisco Javier Meza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MDL 2816 IN RE: SORIN 3T HEATER-COOLER SYSTEM
as 1:2018md02816
Defendant:
SORIN 3T HEATER-COOLER SYSTEM, Sorin Group USA, Inc., Livanova Deutschland GMBH and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Whipkey, Richard Whipkey, Alfonso Goree and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Meza-Acosta
as 2:2017mj03104
Defendant:
Francisco Javier Meza-Acosta (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Unknown:
US Attorney's Office
Francisco Javier Meza-Acosta
as 2:2017mj03104
Defendant:
Francisco Javier Meza-Acosta (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Unknown:
US Attorney's Office
USA v. Javier Meza
as 15-50150
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAVIER MARTIN MEZA, also known as Meza, also known as Javier Meza, also known as Javier M. Meza
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
