Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Leon-Gaud et al v. Autonomous Municipality of Ponce et al
as 3:2023cv01172
Plaintiff:
Jose G Leon-Gaud, Juan A Fraticelli-Cabrera, Maribel Perez-Torres and others
Defendant:
Autonomous Municipality of Ponce, Luis M. Irizarry-Pabon, Conjugal Partnership Irizarry-Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Pacheco-Sanchez v. Pure Proactive Health, Inc.
as 6:2022cv01122
Plaintiff:
Javier Pacheco-Sanchez
Defendant:
PURE PROACTIVE HEALTH, INC. d/b/a BETR HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02072
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Darwish v. Yonkers Racing Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00253
Defendant:
Yonkers Racing Corporation, Joshua Belloise, Javier Pacheco and others
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Darwish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Javier Tinajero Pacheco v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-72797
Petitioner:
JAVIER TINAJERO PACHECO, AKA Javier Pacheco, AKA Javier Tinajero
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
USA v. Javier Ramirez-Pacheco
as 13-10629
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAVIER RAMIREZ-PACHECO, AKA Javier Pacheco Ramirez
Pacheco v. Continental Tire the Americas, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00267
Plaintiff:
Javier Pacheco
Defendant:
Continental Tire the Americas, LLC, Ford Motor Company and Does 1 to 20 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pr Petition for Removal
Javier Pacheco v. J. Hartley
as 10-56701
Petitioner - Appellee:
JAVIER PACHECO
Respondent - Appellant:
J. HARTLEY, Warden
Evanston Insurance Company v. Javier Pacheco et al
as 2:2010cv05761
Defendant:
Aztel Escobar and Javier Pacheco
Plaintiff:
Evanston Insurance Company
Jose Pacheco Miranda v. Commr. of Social Security
as 10-11204
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE JAVIER PACHECO MIRANDA
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
