Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jenkins v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv17971
Plaintiff:
Jay Jenkins
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MCMANUS v. COUNTY OF LEHIGH et al
as 5:2023cv00464
Plaintiff:
JOHN MCMANUS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LEHIGH, JACOB E HAMMOND, CHAD L BURRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Austin v. Jenkins et al
as 4:2020cv04195
Plaintiff:
Darryl W Austin
Defendant:
Jay Jenkins, sammy mumphery and YJ Productions and Concerts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Austin v. Jenkins et al
as 4:2017cv00392
Plaintiff:
Darryl W Austin
Defendant:
Jay Jenkins, Sammy Mumphery and YJ Productions and Concerts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jenkins v. Monarch Recovery Management, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00067
Plaintiff:
Jay Jenkins, Jr.
Defendant:
Monarch Recovery Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MCHUGH v. KOONS et al
as 5:2014cv07165
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCHUGH
Defendant:
KOONS, LOBACH, JAY JENKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00164
Plaintiff:
Jay Jenkins and Lisa Jenkins
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hutson v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2013cv02862
Plaintiff:
Lee Hutson, Sr.
Defendant:
Jay Jenkins, Donald Earl Cannon and Cannon Music, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Jenkins v. Zakheim & Lavrar, P.A.
as 3:2012cv00061
Plaintiff:
Jay Jenkins, Jr.
Defendant:
Zakheim & Lavrar, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Judkins v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2012cv00020
Plaintiff:
Janet A. Judkins
Defendant:
Jay Jenkins and Plain City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
