Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Simpson v. Macon County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2017cv02266
Plaintiff:
Brian Simpson
Defendant:
Macon County Sheriff's Office, Howard Buffett, City of Decatur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Maloney et al
as 1:2017cv01475
Plaintiff:
Adam C Smith
Defendant:
Corey Maloney, Kurt Bode, Robert C Bollinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv04657
Plaintiff:
Pamela Scott and Jay Scott
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carney v. Decatur Police Department et al
as 2:2017cv02222
Plaintiff:
Adam G Carney
Defendant:
Decatur Police Department, City of Decatur, States Attorney Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Virgin Mobile USA, L.P. v. Pat Apple et al
as 2:2017cv02524
Defendant:
Jay Scott Emler, Shari Feist Albrecht, Pat Apple and others
Plaintiff:
Virgin Mobile USA, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Thompson v. Tanner et al
as 2:2017cv02116
Plaintiff:
Scott D Thompson
Defendant:
Joshua Tanner , Stephen Bean , Edward D Yoder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Womack v. Horan et al
as 6:2017cv06278
Plaintiff:
Korane Womack
Defendant:
Timothy Horan, Adrienne Dandrea, Mark Donovan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Safeco Insurance Co of Oregon
as 1:2017cv00378
Plaintiff:
Jay Scott
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Co of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Chapman v. Decatur Police Department et al
as 2:2017cv02032
Plaintiff:
Melvin Lee Chapman
Defendant:
Decatur Police Department, James Getz, Jr, Joe L Patten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2016cv02289
Plaintiff:
Telly C Young, Avers Douglas, Jerry Harris and others
Defendant:
Jay Scott and Jeffery Giesler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
