Cases 31 - 40 of 90
Anthony Dawkins v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 10-55232
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY D. DAWKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE WOODFORD, T. OCHOA, Chief Deputy Warden, C. BUTLER and others
Stacey Langley v. Thomas Carey, et al
as 10-15014
Petitioner - Appellant:
STACEY D. LANGLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS CAREY and JEANNE WOODFORD
Ashker et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 4:2009cv05796
Plaintiff:
Todd Ashker and Danny Troxell
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Mathew Cate, Roderick Q. Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Victory v. Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 09-17613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL VICTORY
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, JEANNE WOODFORD, Director of Corrections, JAMES A. YATES, Warden and others
Aurelio Sepulveda v. S. Suryadevara, et al
as 09-17631
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AURELIO MARTIN SEPULVEDA
Defendant - Appellee:
S. SURYADEVARA, M.D., SHU-PIN WU, M.D., FOUAD SALAMA, M.D. and others
Darryl Schlappi v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 09-17589
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRYL A. SCHLAPPI
Respondent - Appellee:
JEANNE WOODFORD, Board of Prison Terms - Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA
Dawkins v. Woodford et al
as 3:2009cv01053
Defendant:
D Gonzalez, Jeanne Woodford, T Ochoa and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony D Dawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcus Eduardo Mendiola v. Jeanne Woodford
as 3:2009cv01442
Petitioner:
Marcos Eduardo Mendiola
Respondent:
Jeanne Woodford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hayes v. Dovey et al
as 3:2009cv01016
Plaintiff:
Dontay D Hayes
Defendant:
John Dovey, Jeanne Woodford, J G Giurbino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knapp v. Arlitz et al
as 1:2009cv00412
Plaintiff:
Eric Charles Rodney Knapp
Defendant:
Arlitz, Matthew Cate, Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
