Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Penn v. McDonald et al
as 2:2010cv02256
Plaintiff:
Marlin Penn
Defendant:
McDonald, Jeanne Woodford, M. Keating and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Woodford
as 3:2010cv01015
Petitioner:
Edward Jones
Respondent:
Jeanne Woodford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cornejo v. Woodford et al
as 2:2010cv00654
Petitioner:
Efrain Cornejo
Respondent:
Jeanne Woodford and M Martel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Concepcion Rios Reyes et al v. Kathleen Dickinson, Warden
as 2:2010cv01226
Respondent:
Katheleen L. Dickinson, J. F. Salazar and Jeanne Woodford
Real Party In Interest Defendant:
People of The State of California
Petitioner:
Concepcion Rios Reyes
Ashker et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 4:2009cv05796
Plaintiff:
Todd Ashker and Danny Troxell
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Mathew Cate, Roderick Q. Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawkins v. Woodford et al
as 3:2009cv01053
Defendant:
D Gonzalez, Jeanne Woodford, T Ochoa and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony D Dawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcus Eduardo Mendiola v. Jeanne Woodford
as 3:2009cv01442
Petitioner:
Marcos Eduardo Mendiola
Respondent:
Jeanne Woodford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hayes v. Dovey et al
as 3:2009cv01016
Plaintiff:
Dontay D Hayes
Defendant:
John Dovey, Jeanne Woodford, J G Giurbino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knapp v. Arlitz et al
as 1:2009cv00412
Plaintiff:
Eric Charles Rodney Knapp
Defendant:
Arlitz, Matthew Cate, Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Shaddai v. Woodford et al
as 2:2008cv02429
Plaintiff:
Adonai El-Shaddai
Defendant:
Jeanne Woodford and D. L. Runnels
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
