Cases
Weltman v. Lipscomb et al
as 4:2022cv00078
Plaintiff: David Moses Weltman
Defendant: Larry Lipscomb, Kristine Weitzell, Shawn Howard and others
Interested Party: William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEASLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv41858
Plaintiff: JEFF BEASLEY
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniel Teal v. Jeff Beasley, et al
as 20-13848
Defendant / Appellee: TONI BOWDEN, G. WELLHAUSEN, LEAVINS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL K. TEAL
Daniel Teal v. Attorney General, State of Flo, et al
as 20-12740
Defendant / Appellee: TONI BOWDEN, Greviance Coordinator Supervisor, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, G. WELLHAUSEN, Greviance Coordinator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL K. TEAL
Teal v. Warden et al
as 3:2018cv00402
Plaintiff: Daniel K. Teal
Defendant: Warden, Henry, Assistant Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teal et al v. Beasley et al
as 3:2016cv01333
Plaintiff: Daniel K Teal
Defendant: Julie Jones, Jeff Beasley, Landrum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teal v. Bondi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv01402
Plaintiff: Daniel Kevin Teal
Defendant: Pamela Jo Bondi, Julie Jones, Jeff Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Noori et al v. City of Davis et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00197
Plaintiff: Mostafa Noori, Selaiman Noori and Omar Atebar
Defendant: City of Davis, Jeff Beasley, Scott Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ivy Anderson, et al v. City of Davis, et al
as 08-17112
Plaintiff - Appellant: IVY ANDERSON and DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF DAVIS, DAVIS POLICE DEPARTMENT, JIM HYDE, individually and in his capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Davis and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?