Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Darden v. C.M.S. et al
as 3:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
Dustin Thomas House Darden
Defendant:
C.M.S., Jeff Nelson, Randy Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Nelson v. City of Fairfield Police Dept.
as 2:2022cv01619
Plaintiff:
Jeff Nelson
Defendant:
City of Fairfield Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Nelson v. City of Fairfield et al
as 2:2022at00024
Plaintiff:
Jeff Nelson
Defendant:
City of Fairfield and DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd Roberts v. Springfield Utility Board, et al
as 21-36052
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TODD ROBERTS
Defendant / Appellee:
SPRINGFIELD UTILITY BOARD, a Public Body, JEFF NELSON, in his individual capacity, BOB FONDREN, in his individual capacity and others
Allen v. Nelson et al
as 2:2021cv01097
Plaintiff:
Joseph Allen
Defendant:
Jeff Nelson, City of Auburn and auburn police department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2021cv01096
Plaintiff:
Auburn City Police Department and Joseph Allen
Defendant:
Jeff Nelson and Auburn City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Obet v. City of Auburn et al
as 2:2020cv00883
Plaintiff:
Estate of Isaiah Obet and Slaughter Motin Obet
Defendant:
Officer Jeff Nelson and Auburn City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Springfield Utility Board et al
as 6:2019cv01595
Defendant:
Bob Fondren, Jeff Nelson, Chandra Hatfield and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson et al v. Sea World, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00566
Defendant:
Sea World, LLC, Does 1-25 and Sea World Parks and Entertainment, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jeff Nelson and Debra Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pi
Bruce Remington v. John Mathson, et al
as 18-16352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE REMINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MATHSON, JOY MATHSON, RAO CONSTRUCTION, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
