Cases 1 - 10 of 2,470
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00797
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Benjamin Oryang v. Waugh, et al
as 24-11287
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN BEDOGWAR ORYANG
Defendant:
WAUGH, PERRYMAN, BELL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Miriam Tidwell v. Jefferson Dunn, et al
as 24-11228
Plaintiff:
MIRIAM TIDWELL, Administrator of the Estate of James O'Quinn, Deceased
Defendant:
JEFFERSON DUNN, Commissioner of the Alabama Department of Corrections in his offical and individual capacities, DEBORA TONEY, In her official and individual capacities, WARDEN, STATON CF and others
HILL v. WARDEN JEFFERSON CI
as 4:2024cv00164
Petitioner:
REGINALD HILL
Respondent:
WARDEN JEFFERSON CI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Dunn et al
as 7:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Betty Alexander
Defendant:
Commissioner Jefferson Dunn, Commissioner Ruth Naglich, Warden Christopher Gordy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
