Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matthews et al v. Guest Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00910
Plaintiff:
Robert Matthews, Lawrence Jackson, Jeffrey Johnson and others
Defendant:
Guest Services, Inc., Guest Services, Inc. Termination Pay Plan, Gerard Gabrys and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Criswell v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01482
Plaintiff:
Jefferson Criswell
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
POTTS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00947
Plaintiff:
BRANDON JEFFERSON POTTS, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jefferson v. Honeywell International, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00603
Plaintiff:
Debbie Jefferson
Defendant:
Honeywell International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
POTTS v. USA
as 1:2023cv00824
Petitioner:
BRANDON JEFFERSON POTTS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Oxendine v. Hunt et al
as 7:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
Gregory Oxendine
Defendant:
Garrett Paul Hunt, Brian Jefferson Chavis, Colin Deen Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
