Cases 11 - 20 of 147
STATEWIDE BONDING, INC et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2018cv02519
Plaintiff:
BIG MARCO INSURANCE AND BONDING SERVICES, LLC, MIKE DONOVAN, STATEWIDE BONDING, INC and others
Defendant:
JODY M. PRESCOTT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
JIA et al v. NIELSEN et al
as 1:2018cv02468
Plaintiff:
QINGMEI YU, BIN JIA and QINGMEI YAO
Defendant:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, GREGORY RICHARDSON, DONALD NEUFELD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
MS. Q. et al v. US IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT et al
as 1:2018cv02409
Plaintiff:
MS. Q. and J.
Defendant:
US IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, RONALD D. VITIELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02392
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02391
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02375
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02366
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
NARAGHI v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2018cv02361
Defendant:
U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMAD NARAGHI
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
VITYUK v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2018cv02357
Defendant:
LINDA SWACINA, JOHN F. KELLY, JEFF SESSIONS and others
Plaintiff:
OXANA VITYUK
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
