Cases 1 - 10 of 11
McConnell v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01061
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lee McConnell
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production Inc and BP America Production Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 in
Hawkins v. Drug Enforcement Agency et al (INMATE 1)
as 4:2019cv00572
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lee Hawkins
Defendant:
Deputy Sentell, Detective Green, Sgt. Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Drug Enforcement Agency et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00197
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lee Hawkins
Defendant:
Deputy Sentell, Detective Green, Sgt. Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Dunn et al
as 1:2016cv00473
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lee
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn and Cynthia Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Bentley, et al. (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00849
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lee Hawkins
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Centre Alabama Judicial Body
as 5:2013cv01828
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lee Hawkins
Defendant:
Centre Alabama Judicial Body
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Jones et al
as 2:2011cv01710
Petitioner:
Jeffery Lee Thomas
Respondent:
Kenneth Jones and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lee v. Allen
as 1:2010cv00587
Petitioner:
Jeffery Lee
Respondent:
Richard Allen
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Death Penalty)
Thomas v. Hale et al
as 2:2010cv00939
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lee Thomas
Defendant:
Mike Hale and Jefferson County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dean v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2009cv02374
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lee Dean
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
