Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Etterson v. Riverside Regional Jail et al
as 3:2017cv00334
Plaintiff:
Victor Etterson
Defendant:
Riverside Regional Jail, MoJa Motsumi, Dr. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brownlee v. Newcome et al
as 3:2016cv00680
Plaintiff:
Sean A. Brownlee
Defendant:
Jeffery Newcome, Jones, Sample and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Etterson v. Riverside Regional Jail et al
as 3:2016cv00678
Plaintiff:
Victor Etterson
Defendant:
Riverside Regional Jail, Dr. Moja Motsumi, Dr. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Green v. E. Boakye
as 15-7885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH L. GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
E. BOAKYE, Medical Director Riverside Regional Jail and JEFFERY NEWTON
Defendant:
JEFFERY NEWCOME, RIVERSIDE REGIONAL JAIL, et al., VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Victor Etterson v. E. Boakye
as 15-1723
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTOR M. ETTERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
E. BOAKYE, Dr., Director of Medical Dept., Riverside Regional Jail, JEFFERY NEWCOME, Superintendent, Riverside Regional Jail, WOODS, Jailer, Riverside Regional Jail and others
Baker v. Daniels et al
as 2:2014cv00621
Plaintiff:
Andrew C. Baker
Defendant:
Mrs. Daniels, McCormic and Jeffery Newcome
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Boakye et al
as 1:2014cv01644
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Green
Defendant:
E. Boakye, Jeffery Newcome and Keys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sourdiff v. Riverside Regional Jail et al
as 2:2014cv00598
Plaintiff:
Russell M. Sourdiff, II
Defendant:
Riverside Regional Jail, Dr. Boakye, Nurse Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rice v. Newcome et al
as 2:2014cv00501
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Rice
Defendant:
Jeffery Newcome, Captain Mack #8 and Cpl. Jail. Jones #231
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
