Cases 1 - 10 of 349
Pierce
as 6:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sawyer et al v. Marion County et al
as 3:2023cv01971
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Sawyer and Baltazar Ortiz
Defendant:
Marion County, Clackamas County, Ellen F. Rosenblum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sandoval v. Sundquist
as 3:2023cv01906
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Edward Sandoval, Jr.
Respondent:
Ms. Amber Sundquist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson et al v. General Motors LLC
as 3:2023cv01831
Plaintiff:
Melissa Anderson, Matthew Bernert, Brett Alan Boettcher and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Civelli et al v. Lumen Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01739
Plaintiff:
Jarrett Civelli, Christopher Rosing and Jeffrey Haagenson
Defendant:
LUMEN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CENTURYLINK COMMUNICATONS, LLC, QWEST BROADBAND SERVICES, INC. d/b/a CENTURYLINK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 cl Class Action Fairness Action - 2005
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mosher v. State of Oregon
as 3:2023cv01303
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey W. Mosher
Defendant:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Trump et al
as 3:2023cv01296
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mendenhall v. Griner et al
as 6:2023cv01255
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Aiden Mendenhall
Defendant:
Ms. Griner, Ms. Hartman, Ms. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Applegate v. Garrett
as 3:2023cv00775
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Michael Applegate
Respondent:
Patrick Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
