Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-5190
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01916
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
PATTERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv00803
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, CARLOS GIMENEZ, WELLPATH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DIMITRI PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
PATTERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv00686
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, CARLOS GIMENEZ, WELLPATH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DIMITRI PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Curry v. Trump et al
as 1:2019cv02984
Defendant:
Neil M. Gorsuch, United States Senate, Maureen O'Connor and others
Plaintiff:
Carline Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
PATTERSON v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2019cv00897
Defendant:
MICHAEL DUGGAN, JEFFREY ATKINS, SCOTT S. HARRIS and others
Plaintiff:
DIMITRI PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Patterson v. Russell et al
as 6:2019cv00520
Defendant:
Michael Duggan, Chad K. Alvaro, Tiffany Moore Russell and others
Plaintiff:
Dimitri Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE et al
as 1:2014cv00709
Plaintiff:
RICHARD COLEMAN
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, KENNETH MCHUGH, C.J. DALIARIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Coleman v. State of New Hampshire, et al
as 14-5075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Richard Coleman
Defendant - Appellee:
State of New Hampshire, Kenneth Mchugh, Judge and as Individual, C.J. Daliaris, Judge and as Individual and others
COLEMAN v. STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE et al
as 1:2014cv00290
Plaintiff:
RICHARD COLEMAN
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, KENNETH MCHUGH, C.J. DALIARIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
