Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Mel-Tina Ltd. et al v. Ascent Resources - Utica LLC
as 2:2020cv03682
Plaintiff:
Christine Curtis, Gregory Eaton, Michael DeRosa and others
Defendant:
Ascent Resources - Utica, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Jeffrey Curtis, et al v. Marquette Exploration, LLC, et al
as 15-3588
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
JEFFREY CURTIS and CHRISTINE CURTIS
Defendant:
MARQUETTE EXPLORATION, LLC
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
HESS OHIO RESOURCES, LLC
Jeffrey Curtis, et al v. Marquette Exploration, LLC, et al
as 15-3579
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JEFFREY CURTIS and CHRISTINE CURTIS
Defendant:
MARQUETTE EXPLORATION, LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
HESS OHIO RESOURCES, LLC
Allen v. Calhoun, County of et al
as 1:2014cv00285
Plaintiff:
William Allen
Defendant:
Calhoun, County of, Christopher Young, John Dally and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis et al v. Marquette Exploration, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00453
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Curtis and Christine Curtis
Defendant:
Marquette Exploration, LLC and Hess Ohio Resources LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Oberhausen et al v. Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government et al
as 3:2007cv00198
Plaintiff:
Mary Oberhausen, Mary Oberhausen, Mary Oberhausen and others
Defendant:
Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government, the successor in interest to the City of Louisville, Kentucky; Jefferson County, Kentucky and the Jefferson County Kentucky Fiscal Court, Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government, the successor in interest to the City of Louisville, Kentucky; Jefferson County, Kentucky and the Jefferson County Kentucky Fiscal Court, Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government, the successor in interest to the City of Louisville, Kentucky; Jefferson County, Kentucky and the Jefferson County Kentucky Fiscal Court and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
