Cases
Cases 21 - 26 of 26
Curtis v. Winnebago County et al
as 3:2011cv50207
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Curtis
Defendant: Winnebago County and AFSCME Local 473
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Jeffrey Palmer v. Warden, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-57034
Plaintiff - Appellant: JEFFREY CURTIS PALMER
Defendant - Appellee: WARDEN, CIM, RC-West Facility, CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER, CIM, RC-West Facility, REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR, (PR & CD) and others
Jeffrey Curtis Palmer v. Warden et al
as 5:2010cv01270
Defendant: Chief Medical Officer, Chigolla and Warden
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Curtis Palmer
PR & CD: Regional Administrator
ALOZIE et al v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00582
Plaintiff: INNOCENT ALOZIE , ALL PLAINTIFFS , JOKAIRA ARIAS and others
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Oberhausen et al v. Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government et al
as 3:2007cv00198
Plaintiff: Mary Oberhausen, Mary Oberhausen, Mary Oberhausen and others
Defendant: Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government, the successor in interest to the City of Louisville, Kentucky; Jefferson County, Kentucky and the Jefferson County Kentucky Fiscal Court, Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government, the successor in interest to the City of Louisville, Kentucky; Jefferson County, Kentucky and the Jefferson County Kentucky Fiscal Court, Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government, the successor in interest to the City of Louisville, Kentucky; Jefferson County, Kentucky and the Jefferson County Kentucky Fiscal Court and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Jacob v. DaimlerChrysler Corporation
as 3:2007cv00869
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Curtis Jacob
Defendant: DaimlerChrysler Corporation, DaimlerChrysler Corporation and DaimlerChrysler Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?