Cases 1 - 10 of 11
PETTAWAY v. MILLER et al
as 1:2020cv00073
Defendant:
RYAN MILLER and JEFFREY DITTY
Plaintiff:
WYANE PETTAWAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PETTAWAY v. WOLF et al
as 1:2018cv00306
Defendant:
HEARING EXAMINER SZELEWSLI, SGT. MACKINTOSH, BRYAN E. FLINCHBAUGH and others
Plaintiff:
WAYNE PETTAWAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Shakur Gannaway v. Prime Care Medical Inc, et al
as 16-1019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAKUR D. GANNAWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
CAMP HILL SCI, LIZHONG, ADAPT INC, etc al, William Tillman and others
MARSHALL v CORBETT et al
as 2:2014cv01210
Plaintiff:
KERRY X MARSHALL
Defendant:
TOM CORBETT, JOHN WETZEL, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamison v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2013cv02129
Plaintiff:
Dashawn L. Jamison
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Steven R. Glunt, Jeffrey Ditty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Southers et al
as 3:2013cv01603
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Robinson
Defendant:
Richard Southers, John Wetzel, Shirley Moore-Smeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Ditty et al
as 1:2012cv00631
Plaintiff:
William Brown
Defendant:
Jeffrey Ditty, Richard L Southers, Timothy W Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBERTS v. DITTY et al
as 2:2011cv05710
Petitioner:
RICKY MAURICE ROBERTS
Respondent:
JEFFREY DITTY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Ditty et al
as 1:2011cv01418
Petitioner:
Dane D. Brown
Respondent:
Jeffrey Ditty, Attorney General of the State of PA and Edward M. Marsico, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Toritto v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv00276
Plaintiff:
Joseph Toritto
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Commonwealth of PA, PA State Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
