Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Jeffrey Koenig v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 19-17007
Petitioner:
DONALD J. TRUMP, DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC., JERRY GRIFFIN and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEX PADILLA, Secretary of State of California, in his official capacity and GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JEFFREY S. KOENIG
Donald J. Trump for President,, et al v. Alex Padilla
as 19-17002
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his capacity as a private citizen and DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC.
Petitioner:
JEFFREY S. KOENIG and JERRY GRIFFIN
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEX PADILLA, Secretary of State of California, in his official capacity
Jerry Griffin, et al v. Alex Padilla
as 19-17000
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JERRY GRIFFIN, MICHELLE BOLOTIN, MICHAEL SIENKIEWICZ and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEX PADILLA, Secretary of State of California, in his official capacity
Petitioner:
JEFFREY S. KOENIG
Koenig v. Newsom et al
as 2:2019cv01507
Not Classified By Court:
Jerry Griffin, Melissa Melendez, Donald J. Trump and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey S. Koenig
Defendant:
Alex Padilla and Gavin Christopher Newsom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Koenig v. Newsom et al
as 2:2019at00709
Not Classified By Court:
Jerry Griffin
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey S. Koenig
Defendant:
Alex Padilla and Gavin Christopher Newsom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. et al v. Padilla et al
as 2:2019cv01501
Plaintiff:
Donald J. Trump and Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra and Alex Padilla
Not Classified By Court:
Jerry Griffin and Jeffrey S. Koenig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin et al v. Padilla
as 2:2019cv01477
Plaintiff:
James B. Oerding, Jerry Griffin, Michelle Bolotin and others
Defendant:
Alex Padilla
Not Classified By Court:
Jeffrey S. Koenig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
