Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Robinson v. Kankakee County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv02046
Plaintiff:
Isiah Robinson
Defendant:
Kankakee County Jail, Livingston County Jail and Jerome Combs Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garnett v. Downey et al
as 2:2023cv02230
Plaintiff:
Barron Garnett
Defendant:
Michael Downey, Kankakee County, Jerome Combs Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Comb
as 23-20422
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Zebadiah Jerome Comb
Khristos v. State of Illinois, The et al
as 1:2023cv01401
Plaintiff:
Keywann Khristos
Defendant:
State of Illinois, The, City of Chicago, Chicago Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Jerome Combs Detention Center et al
as 1:2023cv01009
Plaintiff:
Darelle Davis
Defendant:
Jerome Combs Detention Center, . Moss and . Jerkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Oneal et al
as 2:2022cv02279
Plaintiff:
Darelle Davis
Defendant:
. Oneal, John Doe and Jerome Combs Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ownbey v. Jerome Combs et al
as 2:2022cv02221
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Ownbey
Defendant:
Jerome Combs, Stateville Correctional Center and Robinson Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toms v. Kolitwenzew
as 2:2022cv02130
Plaintiff:
Andrew Toms
Defendant:
Jerome Combs Detention Center and Chad Kolitwenzew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santillan v. Jerome Combs Detention Center et al
as 2:2022cv02090
Plaintiff:
Jorge Santillan
Defendant:
Jerome Combs Detention Center, . Jergens and Kolitwenzew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv02082
Plaintiff:
Dexstin Bryant
Defendant:
. Smith, Chad Kolitwenzew and Jerome Combs Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
