Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Davis v. Holbrook
as 23-162
Petitioner:
JOHN MONTY DAVIS and Larry Jerome Johnson
Respondent:
DONALD HOLBROOK, WARDEN
Jerome JohnsonIn re: Jerome Johnson
as 22-3066
Petitioner:
In re: JEROME JOHNSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States v. Johnson
as 22-1206
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
JEROME JOHNSON
Jerome Johnson v. USA
as 21-2597
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Acevedo et al v. Capra
as 21-1822
Petitioner / Appellant:
Tyrone Bowman, Corneal Cordon, Bruce Bryant and others
Petitioner:
Samuel Acevedo
Respondent / Appellee:
Michael Capra, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility
USA v. Jonathan Hills
as 20-50327
Defendant / Appellant:
JONATHAN JEROME HILLS, AKA Jerome Johnathan Hill, AKA Jerome Johnson Hill, AKA Janathan J. Hills, AKA Jerome Hills, AKA Jerome J. Hills, AKA Jerome Johnathan Hills, AKA Jerome Jonathan Hills, AKA Jerome Jonthan Hills, AKA Johanathon Jerome Hills, AKA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Jonathan Hills
as 19-50354
Defendant / Appellant:
JONATHAN JEROME HILLS, AKA Jerome Johnathan Hill, AKA Jerome Johnson Hill, AKA Janathan J. Hills, AKA Jerome Hills, AKA Jerome J. Hills, AKA Jerome Johnathan Hills, AKA Jerome Jonathan Hills, AKA Jerome Jonthan Hills, AKA Johanathon Jerome Hills, AKA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jerome Johnson v. Kenneth Lassiter
as 19-7287
Respondent / Appellee:
KENNETH LASSITER
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEROME JOHNSON
JENKINS et al v. NJ TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
as 2:2017cv02309
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE JENKINS and JEROME JOHNSON
Defendant:
NJ TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. ยง 20109
US v. Roderick Johnson
as 16-4576
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RODERICK JEROME JOHNSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
