Cases 1 - 10 of 43
(SS) Jauregui v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026cv01195
Plaintiff:
Jesse Tyler Jauregui
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv01306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Johnson v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00451
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jess Tyler Johnson
Interested Party:
David Fautsch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States v. Jess Johnson
as 23-2864
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jess Tyler Johnson, also known as Jess Tylor Johnson
Johnson v. Cruze
as 4:2022cv00310
Petitioner:
Jess Tyler Johnson
Respondent:
Brian Cruze
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Riley v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2021cv00269
Petitioner:
Jesse Tyler Riley
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NYREN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv04638
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE TYLER NYREN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAGGMARK v. LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTERS OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA, INC.
as 1:2019at00896
Defendant:
LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTERS OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA, INC.
Plaintiff:
JESSE TYLER HAGGMARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Haggmark v. Les Schwab Tire Centers of Central California
as 1:2019cv01742
Defendant:
Les Schwab Tire Centers of Central California
Plaintiff:
Jesse Tyler Haggmark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
