Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Williams v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2024cv01257
Plaintiff:
Jessie Williams
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Latoya Hughes and Richard Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv21219
Plaintiff:
Carrington Williams and Jessie Williams
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Williams v. FCI Berlin
as 1:2022fp00543
Petitioner:
Jessie Williams
Respondent:
FCI Berlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Williams et al v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2022cv02340
Plaintiff:
Jessie Williams, Brandon Jackson and Abdul Love
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Chaplin Arnold, C. Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Williams et al
as 2:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Brown
Defendant:
Jessie Williams, David Stokes and Stanly Shapard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Lee Brown v. Jessie Williams
as 22-12682
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH LEE BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
JESSIE WILLIAMS, Superintendent, Long State Prison, individual and official capacities
Norris v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Rinaldo Eugene Norris
Defendant:
Jessie Williams, Bobby Tyler, Kimberly Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kidd v. Williams
as 2:2021cv00056
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Kunta Kidd
Defendant:
Jessie Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morales v. Williams
as 21-60317
Respondent / Appellee:
Jessie Williams
Petitioner / Appellant:
Juan Morales
Brown v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv00002
Defendant:
Long State Prison, Georgia Department of Corrections and Jessie Williams
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
