Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Carbajal v. USA
as 1:2024cv00299
Petitioner:
Jose Jesus Carbajal
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Keeley Abram et al v. City of Los Angeles, California
as 2:2023cv09565
Plaintiff:
Keeley Abram, Robert Aceves, Brian Acosta and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, California
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0207 Maximum Hours
USA v. Jose Carbajal
as 20-10025
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE JESUS CARBAJAL
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nava et al v. La Fiesta Mexicano Restaurante of Birmingham Inc et al
as 2:2018cv01379
Defendant:
Sergio Perez, La Fiesta Mexicano Restaurante of Birmingham Inc and Mario Perez
Plaintiff:
Raul Nava and Jose Jesus Carbajal
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
USA v. Jesus Carbajal
as 16-40813
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JESUS CARBAJAL
Carbajal v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv01169
Plaintiff:
Jesus Carbajal
Defendant:
United States of America
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jesus Carbajal et al v. Washington Mutual Bank FA
as 2:2010cv10012
Plaintiff:
Elda Carbajal and Jesus Carbajal
Defendant:
Washington Mutual Bank FA
Candelario Carbajal Flores, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-73901
Petitioner:
CANDELARIO JESUS CARBAJAL FLORES, GEORGINA CARBAJAL and ERIKA EDITH CARBAJAL
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Candelario Carbajal Flores, et al v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
as 08-74893
Petitioner:
CANDELARIO JESUS CARBAJAL FLORES, GEORGINA CARBAJAL and ERIKA EDITH CARBAJAL
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
USA v. Carbajal-Alvarado
as 07-40597
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JESUS CARBAJAL-ALVARADO, also known as Jesus Carbajal, also known as Jesus N Carvajal, also known as Jesus Carbarjar
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
