Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Copeland v. Nevarez et al
as 4:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Copeland
Defendant:
Jesus Nevarez, Jr, Judith Wells and Tarrant County (Family Courts)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NEVAREZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22311
Plaintiff:
JESUS NEVAREZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez et al v. Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv02489
Plaintiff:
Rosalba Rodriguez, Jesus Nevarez, Adrian Garcia Perez and others
Defendant:
Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC, NSK Ltd. and NSK Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
NEVAREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv03255
Plaintiff:
JESUS NEVAREZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diane Haddock v. Tarrant County, Texas, et al
as 19-11327
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEX KIM, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, JEROME S. HENNIGAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DIANE SCOTT HADDOCK
Nevarez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00962
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jesus Nevarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
USA v. Jesus Nevarez-Salazar
as 17-50917
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JESUS NEVAREZ-SALAZAR, also known as Jesus Salazar
Stewart v. Nevarez et al
as 4:2017cv00501
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Stewart
Defendant:
Jesus Nevarez, Jr, Thomas A Wilder and Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nevarez v. People of the State of California
as 4:2015cv04490
Petitioner:
Agustin Jesus Nevarez
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
