Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Song v. NY Fire LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01769
Defendant:
Jian Li Hou, NY Fire LLC, New York Business Fire System Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bairu Song
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
CALLE v. DYNASTY BUFFET INC. et al
as 2:2015cv00546
Plaintiff:
WILSON CALLE
Defendant:
DYNASTY BUFFET INC., LI SONG ZHOU, YI CHOW and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HERNANDEZ et al v. LUCKY LODI BUFFET INC. et al
as 2:2013cv02483
Plaintiff:
ANGEL LUIS HERNANDEZ , EDUARDO SANTIAGO , ORLANDO LUIS and others
Defendant:
LUCKY LODI BUFFET INC., LODI INTERNATIONAL BUFFET INC., DYNASTY BUFFET INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Surefire, LLC v. Powertac et al
as 2:2012cv00100
Plaintiff:
Surefire, LLC
Defendant:
Powertac and Jian Li
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Surefire, LLC v. Powertac et al
as 3:2013cv00832
Plaintiff:
SureFire, LLC
Defendant:
Powertac and Jian Li
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
FENIX FLASHLIGHTS, LLC v. LI et al
as 1:2012cv01310
Plaintiff:
FENIX FLASHLIGHTS, LLC
Defendant:
JIAN LI , BORENCIO DARDEN , JIAN LI AND BORENCIO DARDEN PARTNERSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Yang v. John Doe Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv01753
Plaintiff:
Wen Hu Yang
Defendant:
John Doe Corporation and Jian Li
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Levi Strauss & Co., Inc. v. Ding Shijun et al
as 1:2011cv07495
Defendant:
Chen Qixian, Ding Shijun, Xie Chuan Hua and others
Plaintiff:
Levi Strauss & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Chen v. Holder
as 11-4401
Petitioner:
Zhongyong Chen, AKA Zhong Yong Chen, AKA Jian Li Chen and Yan Ling Li
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
United States of America v. Li
as 11-3667
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Jian Li
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
