Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Carter v. Robb et al
as 0:2017cv01061
Plaintiff:
Ernest Carter
Defendant:
Stacey Robb, Jan Rysh, Darin Haugland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al. v. Dayton et al.
as 0:2017cv00880
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson, Similarly Situated Prisoner's at All Minnesota Correctional Facilities and Other similarly Situated Prisoner's At Rush City Correctional Facility
Defendant:
Mark Dayton, Tina Smith, Tom Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mims et al v. Canadian Home Rotors, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00103
Plaintiff:
Katherine Ann Mims , Michael Gene Mims , SMIMCO, LLC and others
Defendant:
Canadian Home Rotors, Inc., CHR INTERNATIONAL INC.,d/b/a Safari Helicopter, SAFARI HELICOPTER INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yusuf v. Benson
as 0:2016cv03961
Petitioner:
Zakaria Abdinasser Yusuf
Respondent:
Jim Benson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David R. Carlson v. Jim Benson, et al
as 16-4010
Petitioner - Appellant:
David R. Carlson
Respondent - Appellee:
Jim Benson, Warden, Rush City Prison, Lori Swanson, Cory Reed, Duluth Parole Agent and others
Steven White v. Jim Benson
as 16-1890
Petitioner - Appellant:
Steven White
Respondent - Appellee:
Jim Benson
O'Neal v. Johnson et al
as 0:2016cv00375
Plaintiff:
Charles Ricardo O'Neal
Defendant:
Brenda Johnson, Amy Johnson, Mandac and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Dayton et al
as 0:2015cv04429
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson
Defendant:
Mark Dayton , Tina Smith , Tom Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Benson
as 0:2015cv01951
Petitioner:
Steven White
Respondent:
Jim Benson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Benson v. Schmitt et al
as 6:2012cv03442
Plaintiff:
Jim Benson
Defendant:
Daniel Schmitt and Daniel Schmitt & Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
