Cases 1 - 10 of 64
HARRIS v. BOWMAN et al
as 1:2022cv00636
Plaintiff:
HOWARD HARRIS
Defendant:
JIM BOWMAN, M. FLEEGER and JOHN POOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01438
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bigham et al v. D. G. Solem & Sons, Inc.
as 0:2018cv01838
Plaintiff:
Mike McCauley, Jim Bowman, John Quarnstrom and others
Defendant:
D. G. Solem & Sons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131
Bigham et al v. Haught
as 0:2018cv01752
Plaintiff:
Mike McCauley, Jim Bowman, John Quarnstrom and others
Defendant:
Don Haught
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Bigham, et al v. Caldwell Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
as 0:2018cv01230
Defendant:
Caldwell Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Bigham , John Quarnstrom , Robert Vranicar and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Bigham et al v. Test & Balance Associates, Inc.
as 0:2018cv01235
Defendant:
Test & Balance Associates, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Bigham , John Quarnstrom , Robert Vranicar and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Bigham et al v. John W. McDougall Co. Inc.
as 0:2018cv00706
Plaintiff:
James Bigham , John Quarnstrom , Robert Vranicar and others
Defendant:
John W. McDougall Co. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131
Bigham et al v. Airco Heating and Cooling, Inc.
as 0:2018cv00483
Plaintiff:
James Bigham , John Quarnstrom , Robert Vranicar and others
Defendant:
Airco Heating and Cooling, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131
Bigham et al v. Walker Sign Holdings Inc. et al
as 0:2018cv00452
Plaintiff:
James Bigham , John Quarnstrom , Robert Vranicar and others
Defendant:
Walker Sign Holdings Inc. and LS Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131
Bigham et al v. D. G. Solem & Sons, Inc.
as 0:2018cv00303
Plaintiff:
James Bigham , John Quarnstrom , Robert Vranicar and others
Defendant:
D. G. Solem & Sons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
