Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Good v. Sinnott et al
as 2:2021cv04188
Plaintiff:
Howard E. Good
Defendant:
Rebekah Sinnott, Jim Marshall and Clark County Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jim Marshall Photography LLC v. Los Angeles Times Communications LLC et al
as 4:2021cv01138
Defendant:
Los Angeles Times Communications LLC and Apple Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jim Marshall Photography LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Julien v. Kane et al
as 1:2018cv02852
Plaintiff:
Dywand Daytron Julien
Defendant:
No Named Defendants, Davis Talley, Robert Werthwein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jim Marshall Photography LLC v. Loy-Taubman Inc
as 2:2013cv01836
Plaintiff:
Jim Marshall Photography LLC
Defendant:
Loy-Taubman Inc
Suggs v. Marshall
as 2:2010cv00765
Petitioner:
Tyson Joiel Suggs
Respondent:
Jim Marshall
Defendant:
Jim Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tripharma LLC v. Max International LLC et al
as 8:2010cv00196
Defendant:
Jose Marie Abilay, Bill Andersen, Cindy Andersen and others
Plaintiff:
Tripharma LLC
Wood, et al v. City of Macon, GA, et al
as 5:2000cv00515
Plaintiff:
John E. Wood , James J. Wood , Joe Allen and others
Defendant:
Macon, Georgia , C. Jack Ellis , Melvin Waldrop and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Steve Draper , Wayne Avery , Chris Bartlett and others
Consol_defendant:
Macon, Georgia , Melvin Waldrop , Ben Hubbard and others
Objector:
NAACP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Marshall v. Bill Graham Archives, LLC
as 3:2009cv00283
Plaintiff:
Jim Marshall and Jim Marshall
Defendant:
Bill Graham Archives, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Marshall v. Bill Graham Archives, LLC
as 5:2009cv00283
Plaintiff:
Jim Marshall and Jim Marshall
Defendant:
Bill Graham Archives, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jim Marshall v. E.D. Bullard Co., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-61736
Defendant:
E.D. Bullard Co
Plaintiff:
Jim Marshall
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
