Cases 1 - 10 of 55
USA v. Vasquez
as 23-11130
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Rafael Jiminez Vasquez, also known as Rafael Jemeres Vasquez, also known as Lauro Beltran-Lugo
Jiminez, LLC v. AmGUARD Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv01463
Plaintiff:
Jiminez, LLC
Defendant:
AmGUARD Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
McDavid v. Gonzalez
as 23-10885
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roy Lynn McDavid
Defendant / Appellee:
Adam Gonzalez, Head Warden, Michael Miller, Assistant Warden, David S. Dyer, High Security and others
McDavid v. Gonzalez
as 23-10427
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roy Lynn McDavid
Defendant / Appellee:
Adam Gonzalez, Head Warden, Michael Miller, Assistant Warden, David S. Dyer, High Security and others
Davis et al v. National Casualty Company et al
as 3:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Pierre Davis, Markiana Davis, Nakayla Davis and others
Defendant:
Pierre Davis, Jr., National Casualty Company, Juan Carlos Barcaz Jiminez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jiminez v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00659
Plaintiff:
Rueben Jiminez
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Dixon v. Harrison County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv00372
Plaintiff:
Jamar Laneir Dixon
Defendant:
Harrison County Jail, Troy Peters, James Jones and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Penns v. Harrison County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv00371
Plaintiff:
Vartaurse Carnelous Penns
Defendant:
Harrison County Jail, Troy Peters, James Jones and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Penns v. Harrison County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv00221
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Unknown Webb, Unknown Chinn, Unknown McCabe and others
Plaintiff:
Vartaurse Carnelous Penns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
