Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00177
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jiminez v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv03678
Plaintiff:
cynthia jiminez
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, Epic Games, Inc., Roblox Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Martinez et al v. Davis et al
as 1:2022cv05913
Plaintiff:
Pedro Martinez
Defendant:
Barbara A. Davis, K. Rupert, McCoy and others
Intervenor:
C. NORRIS LAW GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CLERVRAIN et al v. DIMON et al
as 1:2021cv02918
Plaintiff:
MANETIONY CLERVRAIN, BRANDAKO, INC and ASHELEY CARMELLE DORSAINVILLE
Defendant:
JAMIE DIMON, ASHLEY BACON, LORI A. BEER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JIMINEZ v. WATSON
as 2:2021cv00206
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY JIMINEZ
Respondent:
T. J. WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Schaap v. Arcuri et al
as 2:2020cv00143
Plaintiff:
Brian Schaap
Defendant:
Sayra Jiminez-Segovia, Arcides Santiago, Louis R Arcuri, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Davis et al
as 1:2019cv07130
Defendant:
Barbara Davis, Anna Jiminez, Cermak Health Services of Cook County and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nevarez v. Dart et al
as 1:2019cv04786
Plaintiff:
Valente Nevarez
Defendant:
Anna Jiminez, Cermak Health Services of Cook County, C.C.D.O.C. Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
