Cases 1 - 10 of 143
Muncey et al v. Hicks et al
as 5:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Ashlie Muncey and Jonathan Tucker
Defendant:
Thomas Lee Hicks, Jr., Jimmy Moore and The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5398
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Villacis v. New York City et al
as 1:2019cv11510
Plaintiff:
Brandon Villacis
Defendant:
PO Jimmie Moore, PO Michael Heinz, New York City and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Shelby County Government et al
as 2:2018cv02637
Undetermined:
Jimmy Moore
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Unknown Jailer 1, Chief Kirk Fields, Sheriff Floyd Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02603
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Undetermined:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Hogrobrooks Harris v. Lane et al
as 2:2018cv02571
Undetermined:
Jimmy Moore
Defendant:
Paul Elissiry, Marti Gerardi Probate Paralegal, Inc. and Byron R. Lane
Plaintiff:
Heather P. Hogrobrooks Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Undetermined:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Moore v. City of San Diego et al
as 3:2018cv01505
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Moore
Defendant:
Officer Luis Carbajal and City of San Diego
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
