Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Able Home Health, LLC v. H Care Jobs, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05532
Defendant:
John Does 1-10 and H Care Jobs, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Able Home Health, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scappatura et al v. Jobs, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00810
Defendant:
Jobs, Inc.
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Sikorsky Aircraft
Plaintiff:
Michael Scappatura
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tishman & Tishman, P.A. v. H Care Jobs, Inc. et al
as 9:2016cv80572
Plaintiff:
Tishman & Tishman, P.A.
Defendant:
H Care Jobs, Inc., Alan Savitch and John Does 1-12
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Comerica Bank v Jacks Jobs Inc, et al
as 2:2015cv12698
Plaintiff:
Comerica Bank, a Texas Banking Association
Defendant:
Jacks Jobs, Inc, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
AKDEMIR et al v. BLACK & DECKER, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv04411
Plaintiff:
LEAH AKDEMIR and CAROLINE AKDEMIR
Defendant:
BLACK & DECKER, INC. , ABC INC., AMAZING SAVINGS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JORDAN v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2009cv05820
Plaintiff:
KEITH JORDAN
Defendant:
SHAWN YOUNG, CARDINAL LOGISTICS, GERMAN RIVERA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sales Jobs Inc v. HRHQ et al
as 4:2009cv02988
Plaintiff:
Sales Jobs Inc and Sales Jobs Inc
Defendant:
HRHQ and JobAnimal.com Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Bounty Jobs, Inc. v. Dayak, Inc.
as 1:2008cv10259
Plaintiff:
Bounty Jobs, Inc.
Defendant:
Dayak, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sales Jobs Inc v. JobAnimal.com Inc
as 3:2008cv04509
Plaintiff:
Sales Jobs Inc and Sales Jobs Inc
Defendant:
JobAnimal.com Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
