Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Clark Thomas v. Charleston County
as 21-6646
Defendant / Appellee:
R. MARKLEY DENNIS, ORIN G. BRIGGS, I, SCARLETT A. WILSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARK D. THOMAS, a/k/a George K. Nichols
Hakim Morris v. Jocelyn Cate
as 20-1538
Defendant / Appellee:
MARCINE HOLMES, JOCELYN B. CATE and DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, (DSS)
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAKIM JAKUIN MORRIS
Morris v. Cate et al
as 2:2019cv02814
Defendant:
Marcine Holmes, Jocelyn B. Cate and Department of Social Services (DSS)
Plaintiff:
Hakim Jakuin Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas v. Charleston County et al
as 2:2017cv01958
Plaintiff:
Clark D Thomas and George K Nichols
Defendant:
Folly Beach, City of, Nathan S Williams, James W Smiley, IV and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Bardes v. John Magera
as 10-1944
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID A. BARDES, individually as a taxpayer; and as next friend of his two minor children DAB and APB
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN M. MAGERA, individually and in his official capacity as State's Attorney for South Carolina Department of Social Services, SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF, CHARLESTON COUNTY SOUTH CAROLINA and others
David Bardes v. John Magera
as 09-2191
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID A. BARDES, individually as a taxpayer; and as next friend of his two minor children, DAB and APB
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN M. MAGERA, individually and in his official capacity as State's Attorney for South Carolina Department of Social Services, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, CHARLESTON COUNTY SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Defendant - None:
ODESSA WILLIAMS, individually and in her official capacity as Charleston County Department of Social Services Director
Bardes v. Magera et al
as 2:2008cv00487
Plaintiff:
David A Bardes
Defendant:
John M Magera, State Of South Carolina, Charleston County South Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
