Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00123
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Ashley et al
as 2:2024cv00110
Defendant:
Sheriff Jody Ashley, Brian Everett, Preston Shedd and others
Plaintiff:
Jevonnte Taylor
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Ashley et al
as 4:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Jevonnte Taylor
Defendant:
Deputy Brian Everett, Deputy Jacob Proctor, Deputy Preston Shedd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Wayne County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Harris
Defendant:
Wayne County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff Jody Ashley and Chief Deputy Mike Mozingo
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. Wayne County et al
as 2:2021cv00132
Plaintiff:
Derrick Warren
Defendant:
Wayne County by and through its Board of Supervisors doing business as Wayne County Adult Detention Center, Sheriff Jody Ashley, Cathy Roberts Robin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Wayne County et al
as 2:2021cv00011
Defendant:
Cynthia Terrell, John Does 1-5, Preston Shedd and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton v. Wayne County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2020cv00186
Defendant:
Wayne County, Mississippi and Sheriff Jody Ashley
Plaintiff:
Shelton Hinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jordan v. Wayne County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2016cv00070
Plaintiff:
Michael Jordan
Defendant:
Wayne County, Mississippi and Jody Ashley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
