Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Alves v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
as 24-1301
Plaintiff:
JOE ALVES, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY
Robinson v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, et al
as 23-2078
Plaintiff:
JOE ROBINSON
Defendant:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and MICHAEL S. REGAN, Administrator, U.S Environmental Protection Agency, In his official capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1695
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alves v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.
as 23-1682
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE ALVES, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO.
Cruz v. US
as 23-1347
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE CRUZ
Defendant / Appellee:
BATOOL KAZIM, GORHAM and UNITED STATES
Solomon v. Frederickson, et al
as 22-1956
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS J. SOLOMON
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANK FREDERICKSON, in his personal capacity and official capacity, PHILIP MAGNUSON, in his personal capacity and official capacity, MICHAEL KENNEFICK, in his personal capacity and official capacity and others
Defendant:
ROBERT C. LAWLESS, NATASHA C. LISMAN, DOUGLAS WOLF and others
Solomon v. Frederickson, et al
as 22-1426
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS J. SOLOMON
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT C. LAWLESS, NATASHA C. LISMAN, DOUGLAS WOLF and others
Defendant:
CATHOLIC CHURCH OF AMERICA, ST JUDE/ALSAC, VINCENT LECLERC and others
Stoute v. Silverfine, et al
as 22-1407
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN STOUTE
Defendant / Appellee:
JEREMY SILVERFINE, WILLIAM G. YOUNG, LEONARD H. KESTEN and others
Markland v. Hicks, et al
as 22-1271
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE MARKLAND
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRIS GREEN, JEFF HICKS, RICK KAHLE and others
McCoy v. Town of Pittsfield, NH
as 21-1908
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE MCCOY and JOSEPH MCCOY
Defendant / Appellee:
PITTSFIELD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
