Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SULLIVAN et al v. CHESTER WATER AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
GREGORY B SULLIVAN
Defendant:
CHESTER WATER AUTHORITY, JUDGE DOMINIC PILEGGI, EEOC PHILADELPHIA OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00167
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
DIMOULAS et al v. USA et al
as 1:2019cv00536
Defendant:
JOHN SCHATTINGER, PRINCIPAL, DAVID WALKER, SUPERINTENDENT, MOUNT VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
ATHANASIOS DIMOULAS, THELSIA DIMOULAS and ANTONIOS DIMOULAS
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. LIBERTY et al
as 1:2019cv00346
Defendant:
TERRY SCOTT DRAKE, JOSHUA BLACK, JOE MANNING and others
Plaintiff:
DARIEN HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHOLA v. SCHOOLS et al
as 1:2017cv00147
Plaintiff:
STEVEN V SHOLA, JR
Defendant:
RANDY SCHOOLS, JOE TOMPKINS, S GALLAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. BANGOR DAILY NEWS et al
as 1:2017cv00120
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY PAUL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BANGOR DAILY NEWS , BANGOR PUBLISHING COMPANY , ABIGAIL CURTIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DIMOULAS v. STATE OF MAINE et al
as 1:2017cv00042
Plaintiff:
ANTONIOS N DIMOULAS
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE, DHHS, ROBERT M LASKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VINCENT v. DORAN, et al
as 2:2014cv00087
Plaintiff:
PIERRE A VINCENT
Defendant:
CHRIS DORAN and JOE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WATSON v. YACHT JAMIE JOE II et al
as 2:2012cv00118
Plaintiff:
DAVID WATSON
Defendant:
YACHT JAMIE JOE II and MARK BADGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
