Cases 41 - 50 of 2,384
Miller-Albarez v. Garland et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Krystle Xylina Miller-Albarez
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Joe Biden, Michelle Lujan Grisham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Cole (PS) v. Roybal
as 1:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
Jack Cole
Respondent:
Joe Roybal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Melons (PS) v. Roybal
as 1:2024cv00052
Petitioner:
Troy Melons
Respondent:
Joe Roybal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Van Zandt et al v. Secura Insurance Companies
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Van Zandt and Van Zandt, LLC doing business as Toni & Joe's Pizzeria
Defendant:
Secura Insurance Companies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Gonzalez v. Biden, et al
as 24-1001
Plaintiff:
ALFREDO P. GONZALEZ
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, et al., MAYORKAS, et al., DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY DHS, GOVERNOR J. POLIS, et al. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Morgan v. Biden et al
as 5:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan
Respondent:
Joe Biden, United States, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
ABUAN v. BIDEN et al
as 5:2024cv00003
Petitioner:
Robert Abuan
Respondent:
Joe Biden, United States and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Price v. Broken Arrow, City of et al
as 6:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
Harold Price
Defendant:
Broken Arrow, City of, Michael Spurgeon, Kenneth Schwab and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
