Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Petty v. Driver et al
as 8:2008cv02301
Petitioner:
Robert William Petty
Respondent:
Joe D. Driver and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Myrick v. Lapton et al
as 2:2008cv00083
Plaintiff:
Henry F. Myrick
Defendant:
Lapton, LaMasters, Oddo and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Boyd v. Driver, et al
as 08-40357
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY BOYD
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE D DRIVER, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Three Rivers, PHILLIP CHILDS, Associate Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Three Rivers, MIKE DUNGAN, Associate Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Three Rivers and others
Ketchup v. Driver
as 2:2008cv00053
Petitioner:
Iran Dwayne Ketchup
Respondent:
Joe D. Driver
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Valenteen v. Driver
as 1:2008cv00089
Petitioner:
Michael Valenteen
Respondent:
Joe D Driver
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Valenteen v. Driver
as 3:2008cv00056
Plaintiff:
Michael Valenteen
Defendant:
Joe D. Driver
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Martin v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 3:2008cv00055
Petitioner:
Tytray Martin
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General and Joe D. Driver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00015
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Smith v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 3:2007cv00156
Plaintiff:
Duane L Smith
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General and Joe D Driver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Martin v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 3:2007cv00150
Plaintiff:
Tytray Martin
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General and Joe D. Driver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
