Cases 1 - 10 of 34
United States of America v. Volk et al
as 2:2057cv03450
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Joe Volk and Julia Volk
Schuh v. Burgum et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Ricky R. Schuh
Defendant:
Doug Burgum, Dave Krabbenhoft, Colby Braun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2023cv00180
Petitioner:
Michael Joe Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Drinks Mohall, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Drinks Mohall, LLC doing business as Drinks and Sarah Beha
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 252 Telecommunications Act of 1996
Ree v. Belcourt School District et al
as 3:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Emerson Joe Ree
Defendant:
Belcourt School District, Michelle Thomas, Melvin Laducer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hoff v. Sayler et al
as 1:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hoff
Defendant:
James Sayler, Stephanie Graving, Jessica Wilkens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruz v. USA
as 3:2023cv00062
Petitioner:
Ruben Joe Cruz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. WF Holdings Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
WF Holdings Inc. doing business as Hooligans Bar and Grill and Robert Klinger
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 252 Telecommunications Act of 1996
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Corum
as 1:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Daniel Corum doing business as 3rd Street Station
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 252 Telecommunications Act of 1996
Rodriguez v. USA
as 3:2023cv00012
Petitioner:
Joe Lenard Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
