Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Rosado vs Instituto Medico Familiar de Carolina et al
as 3:2015cv01170
Plaintiff:
Jesmari Rosado-Rivera and S.G.R.
Defendant:
Intituto Medico Familiar de Carolina, Insurance Companies A, B, C, and D, Conjugal Partnership of Dr. Oscar Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sacramento Perez v. Dalby Health Service, et al
as 14-11137
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SACRAMENTO PEREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
DALBY HEALTH SERVICE, QUINTANA, Dalby Health Cordinator, KERRY DIXON, Warden and others
Montes v. United States of America, et al
as 4:2014cv00107
Plaintiff:
Luigi Montes
Defendant:
United States of America, Fannin County Jail and Johan Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Solano v. Dixon et al
as 5:2014cv00010
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Acosta Solano
Defendant:
K Dixon, H Bryan and Dalby Facility Officers Johan Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. McAdams et al
as 5:2014cv00011
Plaintiff:
Jose Artega Rodriguez
Defendant:
S McAdams, H Bryan and Dalby Health Service Johan Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palacios v. Bryan et al
as 5:2014cv00009
Plaintiff:
Jose Aguirre Palacios
Defendant:
H Bryan and Dalby Health Service Johan Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bautista v. Luera et al
as 5:2014cv00006
Plaintiff:
Roberto Bautista
Defendant:
C Luera, S McAdams and Dalby Health Service Johan Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberto Aguilar Bautista v. NDC Los Angeles Health Service et al
as 2:2014cv00302
Plaintiff:
Roberto Aguilar Bautista
Defendant:
Enforcement and Revenue Operations, Johan Does, MDC Los Angeles and others
Munoz v. Bryan et al
as 5:2014cv00004
Plaintiff:
Feliciano Munoz
Defendant:
H Bryan, L Bond and Dalby Facility Health Service Johan Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montes v. McAdam et al
as 5:2014cv00005
Plaintiff:
Luigi Montes
Defendant:
S McAdam, H Bryan and Dalby Health Service Johan Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
