Cases 1 - 9 of 9
KINNEY v. COUNTY OF BERKS et al
as 5:2022cv02566
Plaintiff:
JACOB S. KINNEY
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BERKS, WARDEN JANINE QUIGLEY, DEPUTY WARDEN STEPHANIE SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
REDDICK v. BETHEA et al
as 1:2021cv16117
Plaintiff:
TYRIESE REDDICK
Defendant:
D. BETHEA, CONEY and JOHN/JANE DOE CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HECKER v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 2:2021cv02701
Defendant:
SEARGENT WHARTON, JIMMY KIMMEL, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R HECKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sokalsky v. Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2018cv02146
Defendant:
Corrections Officer George Calpin, Deputy Warden David Langan, Corrections Officer Mills and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Sokalsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHARLESTON v. CORIZON HEALTH, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv05425
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CONSTANCE ORJI and others
Plaintiff:
WAYNE CHARLESTON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. FINNEGAN et al
as 1:2017cv11753
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WAYNE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
FINNEGAN, JOHN & JANE DOE PHYSICIANS, LAUREN MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHARLESTON v. CORIZON HEALTH, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv03039
Defendant:
GERALD MAY, BRUCE BLATT, ELMEADA FRIAS and others
Plaintiff:
WAYNE CHARLESTON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Desmond v. Phelps et al
as 1:2017cv00218
Petitioner:
Christopher R. Desmond
Respondent:
Perry Phelps, Delaware Department of Corrections, James T. Vaughn Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CURRY v. BOROUGH OF TINTON FALLS et al
as 3:2012cv05634
Plaintiff:
GREGORY E. CURRY
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF TINTON FALLS, BOROUGH OF TINTON FALLS POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN SCRIVANIC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
