Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Michael Dorsey v. Sandy McCain, et al
as 18-30926
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL DORSEY
Defendant - Appellee:
SANDY MCCAIN, CASEY MCVEA, JOHN #1 DOE, A-Team Guard and others
Fuentes v. Rupert et al
as 6:2016cv00778
Plaintiff:
Johnny Fuentes
Defendant:
John Rupert, Jeffery Richardson, Brennan Shay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anson Chi v. John Doe
as 16-10584
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANSON CHI
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN #1 DOE, et al
Richard Jennings v. Monty Hudspeth, et al
as 16-40665
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD W. JENNINGS
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTY HUDSPETH, Unit Warden, JOHN #2 DOE, Shift Sergeant, JANE DOE, I, Female Texas Department of Criminal Justice Officer and others
Ali Burress v. Ronnica Blake, et al
as 14-41084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALI JO BURRESS
Defendant - Appellee:
RONNICA BLAKE, BOBBY JOE HONDLEY, JR. and JOHN #1 DOE
Darnell Baldwin v. David Abston, et al
as 14-60576
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARNELL BALDWIN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID ABSTON, Pickens County Alabama Sheriff, KEITH COX, Pickens County Sheriff Det., JOHN MCBRIDE, Pickens County Sheriff Det. and others
Kevin Johnson v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 14-20184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, Executive Director, Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ), REGINA GRIMES, Administrator, Interstate Corrections Compact, STUART JENKINS, Administrator, Interstate Corrections Compact and others
Anson Chi v. John Doe #1
as 14-10261
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANSON CHI
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN #1 DOE
Richard Jennings v. Monty Hudspeth, et al
as 14-40021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD W. JENNINGS
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTY HUDSPETH, Unit Warden, JOHN #2 DOE, Shift Sergeant, JANE DOE, I, Female TDCJ Officer and others
Shields v. Hall et al
as 4:2013cv02872
Plaintiff:
Joe Shields
Defendant:
Benjamin Lewis Hall, III and John #1 Doe
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
