Cases 71 - 80 of 107
Kobel v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 2:2011cv04223
Plaintiff:
Scott Harris Kobel
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Corizon, Missouri Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Buss et al
as 3:2011cv00823
Plaintiff:
Devandal Thomas
Defendant:
Edward Buss, J. Scott Thayer, Julian Aviles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edmund Cowan v. Wiley Calcote, et al
as 11-60536
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDMUND GERALD COWAN
Defendant - Appellee:
WILEY JAMES CALCOTE, LINCOLN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, STEVE RUSHING and others
Mendez v. Doe
as 11-4107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVAN LOPEZ MENDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN 1 DOE, and this criminal organization
Reza Vafaiyan v. FNU Eason, et al
as 11-10497
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REZA VAFAIYAN
Defendant - Appellee:
FNU EASON, Warden, FNU COOK, Assistant Warden, FNU EDWARDS, Correction Officer and others
Asberry v. Doe et al
as 3:2011cv00473
Plaintiff:
Fernandez Antonio Asberry
Defendant:
John #1 Doe, John #2 Doe and John #3 Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reza Vafaiyan v. Eason, et al
as 11-10439
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REZA VAFAIYAN
Defendant - Appellee:
FNU EASON, Warden, FNU COOK, Assistant Warden, FNU EDWARDS, Correction Officer and others
Bailey v. Meyers et al
as 5:2011cv06033
Plaintiff:
David E. Bailey
Defendant:
Timothy Meyers, John #1 Doe, John #2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryan Cooper v. Paul Morales, et al
as 10-50771
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN OSCAR COOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL MORALES, Warden, In His Individual and Official Capacity, DEBRA GLOOR, Medical Facility Administrative Manager, In Her Individual Capacity, JUAN TREVINO, Correctional Officer, In His Individual and Official Capacity and others
v. Bustillo et al
as 6:2010cv03326
Plaintiff:
Fernando Bustillo
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, John Doe, Michael K Nalley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
