Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Rhodes v. Rupert
as 3:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
Gregory Mandel Rhodes
Defendant:
John A. Rupert
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rhodes v. Rupert
as 3:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
Gregory Mandel Rhodes
Defendant:
John A. Rupert
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grant v. Delarosa
as 22-40445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Grant
Defendant / Appellee:
Major Guillermo M. Delarosa, Julie Barbara, John A. Rupert and others
Grant v. Delarosa et al
as 9:2020cv00208
Defendant:
Major Guillermo M Delarosa, Michael L Herrington, James L Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. Delarosa et al
as 6:2020cv00556
Defendant:
Major Guillermo M Delarosa, Michael L Herrington, James L Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. Jackson et al
as 9:2020cv00188
Defendant:
David B Lee, Michael L Herrington, Leroy Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. Jackson et al
as 4:2020cv00424
Defendant:
David B Lee, Michael L Herrington, Leroy Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUPERT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv71804
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT RUPERT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Westfield Insurance Company v. Rupert et al
as 3:2019cv00955
Plaintiff:
Westfield Insurance Company
Defendant:
Marjorie Rupert, John P Rupert and Joshua Glen Fugate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Wallace v. John Rupert, et al
as 18-40252
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN PATRICK WALLACE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN A. RUPERT, JOHN WISENER, L. DOTLES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
